Social Media Recruitment for Academic Research: What You Need to Know

Recruiting participants is one of the most important, and often most frustrating, parts of doing academic research. You can have the best-designed study in the world, but without participants, it goes nowhere. Traditionally, researchers have relied on methods like posting flyers, sending emails through university listservs, or asking participants to refer friends. These methods still work in some cases, but they have limits, especially when you need a diverse group of participants or when you’re working on a tight timeline.

That’s where social media comes in. In the past decade, platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and even LinkedIn have become go-to tools for finding and engaging with research participants. This shift isn’t just a trend; it’s a practical response to how people communicate and spend their time today. A study published in JMIR Research Protocols found that social media can be just as effective, if not more so, than traditional recruitment methods for certain populations, especially when trying to reach groups that are underrepresented in research (Topolovec-Vranic & Natarajan, 2016).

Social media also makes it easier to reach people quickly and cost-effectively. You can post a study ad and start seeing responses within hours. Some platforms let you target by age, gender, location, and even interests or behaviors, which can save a ton of time during the screening phase. That said, using social media for recruitment isn’t as simple as throwing up a post and waiting. There are ethical rules to consider, IRB requirements to follow, and platform policies to navigate. Not to mention, people are more skeptical online, especially when it comes to sharing personal information or participating in studies.

This blog is for researchers who want to use social media to recruit participants, whether you’re just starting out or looking to sharpen your approach. We’ll cover which platforms work best, how to write posts that actually get people to click, and what ethical issues you should be aware of. Think of it as your go-to guide for navigating this new territory in research recruitment.

1. Why Use Social Media for Participant Recruitment?

Let’s be honest, finding the right people to take part in your study is rarely easy. Whether you’re studying health behaviors, social trends, or anything in between, recruitment can eat up a huge chunk of your time, money, and energy. That’s why more and more researchers are turning to social media. At its core, social media recruitment just makes sense. Millions of people scroll through platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and TikTok every single day. According to the Pew Research Center (Auxier & Anderson, 2021), about 72% of U.S. adults use at least one social media platform, with usage fairly consistent across gender and growing steadily among older adults. This means that no matter who you’re trying to reach, teenagers, retirees, people with specific health conditions, or members of a niche community, there’s a good chance they’re online.

Wide Reach, Narrow Targeting

What makes social media stand out from traditional recruitment tools is the combination of reach and precision. You can spread your message far and wide while still zeroing in on the exact type of participant you’re looking for. Let’s say you need to recruit Latina mothers between the ages of 25 and 40 for a parenting study. With Facebook ads, for example, you can target users by age, language, location, and even behaviors or interests, things like parenting, early childhood education, or maternal health. A qualitative study by Frandsen et al. (2016) compared Facebook recruitment to traditional methods like newspaper ads and found that Facebook not only yielded more participants but also did so at a lower cost per participant. Other studies have found that social media is especially useful for reaching populations that are hard to access through more conventional means, like LGBTQ+ youth, people living with rare diseases, or rural populations (Whitaker et al., 2017).

Faster, Cheaper, and More Flexible

Recruiting through social media is also fast. Traditional recruitment methods can take weeks, sometimes months, before you see results. With a well-placed Facebook or Instagram ad, you might start getting survey responses or sign-ups within a few hours. This kind of speed can be a game-changer, especially if you’re up against a grant deadline or trying to collect data during a specific event or time window. Then there’s the cost. While some social media recruitment strategies involve paid ads, even those are generally cheaper than printing flyers or buying space in a newspaper. And if you’re able to post in community groups or get help from influencers or organizations in your field, you might not need to spend much at all. Of course, like any tool, social media isn’t perfect, but the flexibility it offers is hard to beat.

Engagement and Snowballing

One more benefit? Social media isn’t just about broadcasting, it’s about conversation. When someone shares your study post, tags a friend, or comments with a question, they’re helping to spread the word. This kind of organic sharing, also called “snowball recruitment”, can significantly boost your reach without added effort or expense. People are also more likely to respond when the study is shared by someone they know or trust. That’s why working with online communities or advocates can be incredibly powerful. And when participants feel like the qualitative or quantitative research is relevant to them or their community, they’re more likely to engage, not just by clicking a link, but by actually completing your survey, signing up for interviews, or returning for follow-up studies.

A Quick Reality Check

Now, all of this sounds great, and much of it is. But it’s also important to acknowledge that social media isn’t a magical fix. There are real challenges, like making sure your outreach is ethical, protecting participant privacy, and navigating platform rules. You also need to be mindful about how you present your study, especially when reaching vulnerable or skeptical groups.

We’ll talk about those challenges soon. But first, let’s take a look at the different platforms available and how to choose the right one for your specific research goals.

2. Choosing the Right Platforms

Once you’ve decided to use social media for recruitment, the next big question is: which platform should I use? The truth is, not all platforms are created equal, especially when it comes to academic research. Each one has its own vibe, user base, and tools. Picking the right one depends on who you’re trying to reach and what kind of study you’re running. Let’s break down the most commonly used platforms and how they work in a research setting.

Facebook: Still a Powerhouse for Recruitment

Despite all the buzz around newer apps, Facebook is still one of the most useful platforms for recruiting participants. Why? Because it has a huge and diverse user base, especially among adults over 30, which is a key demographic for many health and behavioral studies. According to statistical data from Pew Research (Auxier & Anderson, 2021), about 69% of U.S. adults use Facebook, and usage remains steady even in older age groups.

Facebook also gives you multiple ways to recruit. You can run targeted ads, post in public or private groups, create an event page, or even boost a regular post to reach more people. Ads are especially useful because you can target users based on age, gender, location, interests, behaviors, and even relationship status or parental status. A study by Reuter et al. (2019) found that Facebook ads were not only effective at data collection for health research but also helped recruit a more diverse sample than traditional methods.

Group engagement can also go a long way. Many local and interest-based groups allow research postings, as long as you follow their rules. But don’t just drop a link and disappear. When researchers take the time to introduce themselves and answer questions, group members are more likely to engage and share the post with others.

Instagram: Visuals Matter Here

Instagram tends to skew younger, with a strong base among users aged 18–29. If your study is aimed at college students, young adults, or anyone who lives online visually, Instagram is worth considering. Unlike Facebook, it doesn’t have groups, but it does offer highly visual ad formats, Stories, and Reels that can be engaging and interactive. It’s important to remember that the algorithm here favors creativity and consistency. Posts with eye-catching images or videos, short and clear captions, and a bit of personality tend to do better. Researchers have started using Instagram to run paid ads for surveys, or even to host accounts where they post about their research journey. This helps build credibility and trust with potential participants. While the scholarly literature on Instagram-specific recruitment is still developing, many researchers report success when using it to recruit younger adults or visually-oriented audiences (Ali et al., 2020).

LinkedIn: Professional and Niche Audiences

LinkedIn isn’t usually the first platform people think of for recruitment, but in the right context, it can be very effective. If your research is targeting working professionals, people in healthcare, or academics, LinkedIn is the place to be. The platform offers ad services and group discussions, and it’s especially good for reaching people who might be interested in research tied to their career or industry. The tone here is more formal, so your posts or messages should reflect that. You can also reach out to professional associations, alumni networks, or influencers within your field to help promote your qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-method research. While fewer studies have examined LinkedIn’s effectiveness for recruitment compared to Facebook, some researchers have found it useful when trying to reach professionals or recruit expert participants for qualitative research (Topolovec-Vranic & Natarajan, 2016).

Reddit: Tapping into Niche Communities

Reddit may not be as mainstream as Facebook or Instagram, but for certain kinds of research, it’s a goldmine. Reddit is made up of thousands of “subreddits”, communities organized around specific topics, from diabetes management to dog training to Dungeons & Dragons. This makes it perfect for targeting very specific populations. Recruitment on Reddit takes some finesse. Many subreddits have strict rules against self-promotion or research posts. It’s important to read the rules, get moderator approval, and be transparent about who you are and what your study is about. When done respectfully, Reddit users often respond with genuine interest and thoughtful discussion. Some researchers have reported success recruiting participants for sensitive or stigmatized topics, like mental health or substance use, because of Reddit’s anonymous and supportive culture (Sharma et al., 2020).

Twitter/X and Threads: Speed and Visibility

Twitter (now X) and Threads are more fast-paced and less structured than other platforms, but they can still be useful, especially for academic or policy-oriented studies. Twitter is particularly strong in the academic research and advocacy world, the so-called “Academic Twitter” crowd, where sharing studies, calls for participants, and research updates is part of the culture. What these platforms lack in targeting tools, they make up for in speed and visibility. A single tweet or post, if shared by the right person, can reach thousands. Hashtags and tagging relevant users can increase your reach significantly. Threads, which has a growing academic and health community, can serve a similar purpose, though it’s still evolving. The key here is networking. Build a little presence, engage with others in your field, and when it’s time to recruit, your message is more likely to get noticed and shared organically.

So, Which Platform Should You Choose?

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer. The right platform depends on your target population, the tone of your study, and how much time or budget you’re working with. Some researchers even use a multi-platform approach, posting ads on Facebook while sharing the study organically on Reddit and Twitter. It takes more work, but it can improve both reach and diversity. In the next section, we’ll take a closer look at the ethical and regulatory side of things, because while social media can be powerful, it also comes with some important responsibilities.

3. Crafting Effective Recruitment Messages

You’ve picked your platform and gotten IRB approval. Now comes the part that can make or break your recruitment efforts: writing the message. This might seem simple, but the truth is, writing for social media is a craft, especially when you’re asking people to join a research study. Your message has to be clear, trustworthy, and engaging, all in just a few lines. It’s not about using flashy buzzwords or manipulating people into clicking. It’s about creating a message that respects your audience’s time and invites them into something that matters. Here’s how to do that well.

Keep It Short, But Not Vague

Attention spans online are short. Most people will scroll past your post in two seconds unless something grabs them. That’s why your message should be short, but also specific. Avoid vague phrases like “Help us with our research!” or “Take this quick survey!” Instead, give a clear snapshot of what your study is about and who you’re looking for. For example:

“Are you a parent of a child under age 5? We’re conducting a university qualitative or quantitative research study on sleep patterns in early childhood. It takes 10 minutes, and participants can enter to win a $25 gift card. Click to learn more.”

That message works because it answers key questions right away: Who is this for? What is it about? How long will it take? What’s in it for me? Research shows that clarity and transparency are major factors in whether someone engages with a study post (Whitaker et al., 2017).

Highlight the Value – But Be Honest

People want to know: “Why should I care?” That doesn’t mean you need to hype it up like a marketing campaign. But it does mean being clear about the purpose of your study and how participation contributes to something meaningful. Whether it’s advancing science, improving healthcare, or helping communities, mention the bigger picture. If there’s an incentive, whether monetary, a prize draw, or just a thank-you, say so clearly. Just don’t overpromise. If you say “10 minutes,” make sure it’s 10 minutes. If you say responses are anonymous, don’t collect names or email addresses unless absolutely necessary.

Use Simple, Everyday Language

Leave the academic jargon in your journal article. On social media, you’re speaking to real people, not your dissertation committee. That means avoiding phrases like “cross-sectional design,” “IRB-approved,” or “data anonymization” in your main post. Instead of:

“This study investigates the effects of nutritional interventions on BMI variance among pre-adolescents.”

Try:

“We’re studying how kids’ eating habits affect their health. If your child is between 9–12 years old, you can take part in our 15-minute survey.”

Plain language not only increases trust but also increases participation. A study by Bender et al. (2017) found that social media recruitment messages written at an 8th-grade reading level had better engagement and response rates than those written more formally.

Include a Clear Call to Action

Every recruitment message should end with a simple, direct-action step. Tell people what to do next, whether that’s “Click here to learn more,” “Fill out the short survey,” or “DM us with questions.” If possible, use a short, trackable link (like Bit.ly or a UTM link) so you can monitor how well your post performs. If you’re posting in a comment section or forum, make sure the link doesn’t look suspicious. Add a sentence like: “This link takes you to our university’s survey platform (Qualtrics), where you’ll find full study details and consent information.”

Visuals Matter – Even Simple Ones

On Instagram and Facebook, especially, posts with visuals perform better. You don’t need to be a graphic designer or seek dissertation help from an academic consultant; just include an image that relates to your topic. Stock photos, icons, or even a logo from your university can help establish legitimacy. Better yet, if your institution allows it, create a simple branded image with your study title and a short caption. Some researchers even record a short 30-second video introducing themselves and explaining their study. That kind of personal touch can help build trust and humanize the process.

Test, Tweak, Repeat

You may not get it right the first time, and that’s okay. Try different messages, formats, or images to see what works best. Facebook Ads Manager, for example, lets you run A/B tests, so you can compare how two versions of a post perform with the same audience. Even without paid ads, you can learn by watching which posts get more shares, clicks, or comments. Data collection is part science, part trial-and-error. The important thing is to listen, adapt, and keep your message respectful and honest.

4. Targeting and Advertising Tools

So, your recruitment message is polished, IRB-approved, and ready to go. Now comes the part where social media earns its keep: targeting. This is where platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and even LinkedIn shine. With the right tools, you can make sure your message reaches exactly the kind of participants you’re looking for, and skip wasting time (and money) on the wrong crowd. Let’s walk through how this works, why it matters, and what to watch out for.

Why Targeting Is So Valuable

Traditional recruitment is often a shot in the dark. You might hang flyers on campus, post to a public forum, or email a listserv, and hope someone who fits your criteria sees it. Social media targeting flips that around. Instead of casting a wide net, you can narrow in on the exact audience that fits your study. For example, say you’re studying first-time mothers between the ages of 25 and 40 who live in rural areas. On Facebook, you can collect data while targeting women in that age range, who recently became parents, and who live in certain ZIP codes or small towns. This doesn’t just save you money, it boosts the chances of hearing back from people who are eligible and interested. Studies support this approach. Frandsen et al. (2016) found that Facebook ads allowed researchers to recruit faster and at a lower cost per participant compared to more traditional outreach methods. The authors noted that this was especially effective for studies with narrow inclusion criteria.

Setting Up a Targeted Campaign (Facebook & Instagram)

Facebook (which also owns Instagram) offers one of the most powerful and user-friendly ad platforms for qualitative and quantitative researchers. You’ll need to create a Meta Ads account, which sounds more intimidating than it is. From there, you can create campaigns that are optimized for specific goals, like website clicks or survey completions. Here’s what you can target:

Location – down to specific cities or a radius around a ZIP code
Interests – like “diabetes awareness,” “pregnancy,” “mental health,” “college student life”
Behaviors – such as recently moved, new parents, or frequent online shoppers
Language – great for recruiting bilingual or immigrant populations

You can even exclude certain groups to avoid showing the ad to people outside your study criteria. That’s useful if your study is limited to adults, for example, or excludes people with certain health conditions. Each ad campaign can have multiple ad sets, which means you can run two slightly different targeting profiles at once to see which performs better. Maybe one ad targets new moms aged 25–35 and another targets moms 35–45, then you compare which gets better response rates.

What About LinkedIn?

LinkedIn’s ad tools are designed for professionals and can be helpful if you’re recruiting by industry, job title, education level, or company. This is ideal if you’re researching workplace behavior, healthcare workers, teachers, or business decision-makers. The targeting isn’t quite as good as Facebook, but it’s cleaner for professional audiences. Expect higher costs per click, but potentially higher-quality responses if your study is program evaluation, business-related, or academic.

Tracking Performance with Analytics

Once your ad is running, you’ll want to monitor how it’s doing. Meta Ads Manager gives you tons of metrics, some useful, some just noise. The ones that matter most for recruitment are:

Reach – how many people saw your ad
Link clicks – how many people clicked your study link
Click-through rate (CTR) – clicks divided by views (the higher, the better)
Cost per click (CPC) – how much you’re paying for each person who clicks
Conversions – if you set up tracking for completed surveys or sign-ups

These numbers help you tweak your strategy. If your CTR is low, maybe your image or headline isn’t working. If CPC is too high, try targeting a broader or slightly different audience. It’s all about testing and refining over time.

Budgeting for Ads

You don’t need a massive budget to run social media ads for recruitment. Many qualitative and quantitative researchers start with $5–$20 per day and adjust based on performance. Facebook lets you set daily limits or a lifetime budget, so you’re always in control. That said, it’s a good idea to allocate a little extra at the beginning for testing. Try different images, headlines, or targeting profiles and see what works. Once you have a winner, you can put more money behind it.

Be Mindful of Ethics and Accuracy

Even with the best tools, remember: this is still research, not marketing. Don’t stretch the truth to get clicks. Don’t use fear-based or emotionally manipulative language. And don’t promise anonymity if you’re collecting identifying info. Ads must match your IRB-approved script, both in what you say and how you target. Also, be aware of platform policies. Facebook, for example, has restrictions around how health-related ads are worded. You can’t say things like “Are you struggling with anxiety?” in the headline, because that assumes personal traits about the viewer. Instead, use neutral language like: “Join our study on anxiety and stress management.”

5. Managing Responses and Screening Participants

Once your recruitment messages are live and people start clicking, it’s easy to feel like the hard part is over. But actually, this is where another set of challenges begins: sorting through responses, screening for eligibility, and making sure you’re collecting good data from real participants. Managing responses well isn’t just about staying organized. It’s about protecting data, respecting participants’ time, and avoiding burnout from sifting through low-quality or irrelevant responses. This step often gets overlooked, but it’s essential to the overall success of your study.

Start with a Screening Survey

It’s tempting to send everyone directly to the main survey or interview signup form, but that often leads to frustration, both for you and your participants. Instead, consider starting with a short, focused screening survey. This initial screener should be quick, ideally under 2 minutes, and only ask for the information you need to determine eligibility. That might include:

Age
Location
Specific behaviors or experiences (e.g., “Have you ever smoked regularly in the past 12 months?”)
Diagnosis or condition (if applicable)
Consent to be contacted if eligible

Many researchers use tools like Qualtrics, Google Forms, or REDCap to build their screeners. These platforms let you automate skip logic, flag incomplete responses, and export lists of eligible participants. A study by Arigo et al. (2020) emphasized how crucial a clean screening step is for maintaining high-quality samples, especially when recruiting online.

Use Email or Text Follow-Up, Carefully

Once someone qualifies based on your screener, the next step is follow-up. For survey-based research, that might mean sending them the full study link. For interviews or focus groups, it may involve scheduling a call or Zoom session. When you reach out, make sure your communication is timely, professional, and consistent with what you told them earlier. If you said, “You’ll hear back within 48 hours,” then honor that. Trust matters here, and prompt replies can make the difference between an engaged participant and one who drops off. That said, be careful not to overwhelm people with too many messages. Only follow up if they’ve opted in and provided permission to be contacted. And if someone decides not to participate, respect that choice without pressure.

Watch Out for Bots and Duplicate Entries

One downside of recruiting online is that you’ll occasionally run into bots, trolls, or people trying to game the system, especially if there’s an incentive involved. It’s not always obvious, but there are red flags to watch for:

Responses completed unusually fast (e.g., a 15-minute survey done in 90 seconds)
Duplicate email addresses or IPs
Nonsensical answers or copy-pasted text
Suspicious Gmail addresses like “qwerty1234@gmail.com”

To reduce this risk, some researchers include attention checks or reCAPTCHA tools. Others delay sending incentives until responses are manually reviewed. It’s not foolproof, but adding even one step of friction (like requiring email confirmation) can help weed out low-quality entries. And if you’re using social media for data collection, you may get fake responses even from paid ads. That’s why it’s smart to monitor your incoming data early and often, so you can adjust targeting or pause the campaign if something feels off.

Keep Participant Info Secure and Organized

Managing responses also means handling personal data responsibly. If you’re collecting names, emails, or any identifying information, make sure it’s stored securely, ideally in a password-protected platform approved by your institution. Avoid storing sensitive info in spreadsheets on your desktop or sharing it over unsecured email. If you’re working with a team, make sure everyone understands the data protection plan, including who has access to what and how long that data will be kept. Finally, track your progress. Create a basic log (or spreadsheet) showing who’s completed the screener, who’s eligible, who’s been contacted, and who has completed the study. This makes follow-up easier and helps you stay on top of deadlines or quotas.

Be Transparent with Participants

This part is often overlooked: communicate clearly with your participants about what happens next. If someone fills out the screener and doesn’t qualify, you might include a polite message saying: “Thanks for your interest! Based on your answers, you’re not eligible for this particular study, but we appreciate your time and would be happy to reach out about future research if you’re interested.”

This small gesture leaves the door open for future contact and helps maintain a positive reputation for your lab or institution. And for those who do qualify, be clear about expectations. Let them know when they’ll receive the full survey link, how long it will take, and when incentives (if any) will be delivered. That level of transparency builds trust and improves your completion rate.

Conclusion

Recruiting participants through social media isn’t just a trend; it’s quickly becoming a core strategy in academic research. Whether you’re running a large-scale health study or a small qualitative project, these platforms offer real opportunities to reach people you might never access through traditional methods. But it’s not just about reach. Social media recruitment lets you connect with participants in ways that are faster, more cost-effective, and often more inclusive. You can find niche populations, engage with communities in real time, and adjust your approach on the fly. It brings a level of flexibility that paper flyers and email listservs just can’t match.

At Precision Consulting, we understand how overwhelming this process can feel, especially when you’re balancing recruitment with the countless other demands of academic research. Whether you’re working on a master’s thesis or navigating the final stages of a PhD, our expert team offers personalized dissertation help, dissertation coach guidance, and full-spectrum dissertation assistance tailored to your needs. If you’re stuck or just need professional insight, our help with dissertation support can help move your project forward with clarity and confidence.

From ethical recruitment strategies to writing, data analysis, and defense prep, Preco’s trusted dissertation services are built to support serious scholars at every stage. If you’re searching for a dissertation help service that goes beyond templates and truly partners with you, or need expert-level dissertation consulting, we’re here to help. Reach out today, and take the next step toward finishing your dissertation with confidence.

References

Ali, S. H., Foreman, J., Capasso, A., Jones, A. M., Tozan, Y., & DiClemente, R. J. (2020). Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01011-0

Arigo, D., Pagoto, S., Carter-Harris, L., Lillie, S. E., & Nebeker, C. (2020). Using social media for health research: Methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digital Health, 6, 2055207620907186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620907186

Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021). Social Media Use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/

Bender, J. L., Cyr, A. B., Arbuckle, L., & Ferris, L. E. (2017). Ethics and privacy implications of using the internet and social media to recruit participants for health research: A privacy-by-design framework for online recruitment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), e104. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7029

Frandsen, M., Walters, J., & Ferguson, S. G. (2016). Exploring the viability of using online social media advertising as a recruitment method for smoking cessation clinical trials. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 18(10), 2256–2264. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw137

Gelinas, L., Pierce, R., Winkler, S., Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., & Bierer, B. E. (2017). Using social media as a research recruitment tool: Ethical issues and recommendations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1276644

Moreno, M. A., Goniu, N., Moreno, P. S., & Diekema, D. (2013). Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(9), 708–713. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0334

Reuter, K., Auger, S., & Harrison, T. M. (2019). Harnessing Facebook for HIV Prevention and Research: A Review of the Literature. AIDS and Behavior, 23(12), 3260–3275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-019-02658-1

Sharma, M., Yadav, K., Yadav, N., & Ferdinand, K. C. (2020). Using social media platforms for recruiting research participants: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(9), 3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9093140

Topolovec-Vranic, J., & Natarajan, K. (2016). The Use of Social Media in Recruitment for Medical Research Studies: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 5(3), e139. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5586

Whitaker, C., Stevelink, S., & Fear, N. (2017). The use of Facebook in recruiting participants for health research purposes: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(8), e290. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7071

blog @ precision